Health nypost.com  Home Delivery
 Archives Search
 Email Newsletters
HOME  |  NEWS  |  COLUMNISTS  |  SPORTS  |  GOSSIP  |  POST OPINION  |  BUSINESS  |  ENTERTAINMENT
 HEALTH
 Features
 In the News
 Media Center
 Videos
 LIFESTYLE
 Lifestyle
 Health
 Pets
 Travel
 NYPOST.COM
 Home
 Archives
 Last 7 Days
 Breaking News
 Business
 Cartoons
 Classified
 Columnists
 Coupons
 Entertainment
 Games
 Gossip
 Home Delivery
 Horoscope
 Learning Center
 Lifestyle
 Lottery
 News
 Post Opinion
 Post Store
 Real Estate
 Reviews
 Shopping
 Sports
 Story Index
 Traffic
 Travel
 TV Listings
 Weather
 SEARCH
 Contact Us
 Job Openings
 News Corp Sites
 Online Media Kit
 Print Media Kit
 Privacy Policy
 Terms of Use
 
SECONDHAND THEORY BLOWS SMOKE: STUDY
By JEANE MacINTOSH

May 16, 2003 -- A new study published in a prestigious medical magazine has found no significant evidence that secondhand smoke causes lung cancer or heart disease.

"The association between [passive smoke] and coronary heart disease and lung cancer may be considerably weaker than generally believed" claimed the study, in the weekly British Medical Journal.

In a surprising twist, the study was backed by anti-smoking crusader Dr. Elizabeth Whelan.

"There is simply no convincing evidence linking secondhand smoke to lung cancer and heart disease," said Whelan, an epidemiologist and president of the American Council on Science and Health.

Whelan, author of "A Smoking Gun: How the Cigarette Industry Gets Away with Murder," said her group's research has reached the same conclusion as the new study.

While Whelan said she's delighted by New York City's smoking ban, she labels "patently absurd" Mayor Bloomberg's claim that it would prevent 1,000 deaths of bar and restaurant workers.

Exposure to cigarettes has "definite, acute health effects" - such as ear infections, respiratory problems and asthma, Whelan said.

But she estimated the deaths prevented by the city's rule would be "between zero and a hypothetical 10 to 15" - and the deaths would likely be from asthma attacks.

"The best way to lose an argument is to overstate it, as I fear Mr. Bloomberg has done," Whelan said.

The British Medical Association called the report "fundamentally flawed," and said it was based on questionable data.


printer Print this story document Previous articles on this topic
copyright Click for permission to reprint


NEW YORK POST is a registered trademark of NYP Holdings, Inc. NYPOST.COM, NYPOSTONLINE.COM, and NEWYORKPOST.COM are trademarks of NYP Holdings, Inc. Copyright 2003 NYP Holdings, Inc. All rights reserved.
line


PageSix