Entrez PubMed Overview Help | FAQ Tutorial New/Noteworthy
PubMed Services Journal Browser MeSH Browser Single Citation Matcher Batch Citation Matcher Clinical Queries LinkOut Cubby
Related Resources Order Documents NLM
Gateway Consumer
Health Clinical Alerts ClinicalTrials.gov PubMed
Central
Privacy Policy
|
|
-
Environmental tobacco smoke in an
unrestricted smoking workplace: area and personal exposure
monitoring.
Jenkins RA, Maskarinec MP, Counts RW,
Caton JE, Tomkins BA, Ilgner RH.
Chemical and Analytical
Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, PO Box 2008, Oak
Ridge, Tennessee 37831-6120, USA. jenkinsra@ornl.gov
The
objective of this investigation was to determine the extent of areal and
day-to-day variability of stationary environmental tobacco smoke (ETS)
concentrations in a single large facility where smoking was both
prevalent and unrestricted, and to determine the degree of daily
variation in the personal exposure levels of ETS constituents in the
same facility. The subject facility was a relatively new four-story
office building with an approximate volume of 1.3 million ft3. The
exchange of outside air in the building was determined to be between 0.6
and 0.7 air changes per hour. Eighty-seven area samples (excluding
background) were collected at 29 locations over the course of 6 days of
sampling. Locations included offices and cubicles occupied by smokers
and nonsmokers, common areas, and the computer and mail rooms.
Twenty-four nonsmoking subjects wore personal sampling systems to
collect breathing zone air samples on each of 3 days in succession. This
generated a total of seventy-two 8-h time-weighted average (TWA)
personal exposure samples. In all samples, respirable suspended
particulate matter, ultraviolet light-absorbing and fluorescing
particulate matter, solanesol, nicotine, and 3-ethenyl pyridine were
determined. With the exception of a few locations, tobacco-specific
airborne constituents were determined in all samples. Not surprisingly,
areas with the highest ETS constituent concentrations were offices and
cubicles of smokers. Median and 95th percentile concentrations for all
area samples, excluding background, were determined to be 1.5 and 8.7
microg/m3 for nicotine, and 8.2 and 59 microg/m3 for ETS-specific
particles (as solanesol-related particulate matter, Sol-PM),
respectively. Personal exposure concentrations of ETS components were
similar to those levels found in the area samples (median nicotine and
Sol-PM concentrations were 1.24 and 7.1 microg/m3, respectively), but
the range of concentrations was somewhat smaller. For example, the 95th
percentile 8-h TWA nicotine and ETS-specific particle (as Sol-PM)
concentrations were 3.58 and 21.9 microg/m3, respectively. Intrasubject
variation of daily concentrations ranged from 20% to 60%, depending on
the component. Self-reported proximity to smokers was supported by
higher ETS concentrations determined from the personal monitors, but
only to a modest extent. Although smoking was completely unrestricted
inside the main office areas of the facility, ETS levels, either areal
or from personal exposure measurements, were lower than those estimated
by Occupational Safety and Health Administration to be present in such
facilities.
PMID: 11687910 [PubMed - in process]
|