|
Washington -- The air quality aboard jetliners
can be hazardous to passengers' health, the National Academy of
Sciences said yesterday, calling for an ambitious monitoring program
that could lead to stricter federal requirements.
"Environmental factors, including air contaminants, can be
responsible for some of the numerous complaints of acute and chronic
health effects in cabin crew and passengers," a panel convened by
the academy's National Research Council said in the first major
report on the subject in more than 15 years.
The 13-member panel said areas of concern for passengers and crew
members alike included cabin pressure, ozone and carbon monoxide
levels, and potential exposures to pesticides and to fumes from
engine oil, hydraulic fluids and de- icing liquid. However,
ventilation systems "do not appear" to facilitate the spread of
viruses and infections, it said.
The air that passengers and crew members breathe aboard a
jetliner is a combination of outside air brought in through the
engines and air from the cabin that is filtered and recirculated.
Among the issues of "high" and "moderate" concern cited in the
report were:
-- Cabin pressure. Federal regulations say the air pressure
aboard a jet at cruising altitude must be no less than it would be
on the ground at an elevation of 8,000 feet. But the panel said that
standard might be insufficient to protect people in poor health and
very young children.
-- Ozone. The pollutant, which is known to irritate breathing
passages and diminish lung capacity, occurs in greater
concentrations high in the atmosphere. But only newer aircraft are
equipped with converters that neutralize ozone.
-- Carbon monoxide. Even low concentrations can cause headaches
and light- headedness. High concentrations can occur when there are
problems with an aircraft's ventilation system. There is no system
for monitoring carbon monoxide levels.
-- Pesticides. Some foreign countries still require flights from
abroad to be sprayed with insecticides. In the United States, the
practice has long been abandoned because of concerns about health
effects.
The report called for the federal government to launch a major
research program into the quality of cabin air, to be overseen by an
independent scientific advisory board.
Standards are inadequate in several areas, the report said. For
example, the FAA requirement for cabin air pressure was set in 1964
"without any rationale," said Eileen Abt, one of the study's staff
directors. "It has never been revisited," she said. Even in a
pressurized cabin, the panel said, the air may be too thin for
people with heart and lung problems, and for the very young.
The report represents a major challenge to government and
industry, said Dr.
Russell Rayman, a panel member and executive director of the
Aerospace Medical Association, which represents health professionals
working in aviation and space medicine.
"They have to be willing to take action that will require a
considerable amount of resources," Rayman said.
The report was originally scheduled for release at the end of
September, but the date was postponed out of concern that its
recommendations would go unnoticed in the aftermath of the terrorist
attacks, Abt said.
The FAA reacted cautiously to the 246-page report. "We need a
little time to review it ourselves," a spokeswoman said. |