‘‘Throughout the nineteenth
century, the vice of ‘self abuse’ or ‘self pollution’ propelled
learned men, and some learned women into postures of perspiring
alarm; they flooded the literatures of medical advice and moral
uplift with macabre case histories and desperate, repetitive pleas
for action before it was too late.’’
— Peter Gay in The Bourgeois
Experience: Education of the Senses
MUMBAI: Enlightened opinion
today has persuaded itself that the act is harmless. But the fear of
masturbation is nevertheless rampant. It generates feelings of guilt
and shame in the vast majority of its uninformed ‘victims’. The
latest research should assuage or even banish such
feelings.
A Melbourne study has found that
frequent ejaculation during masturbation may actually protect men
against the most common form of cancer, by preventing the build-up
of cancer-causing chemicals in the prostate. Sexual intercourse may
not have the same protective effect due to the possibility of
contracting sexually transmitted infections, which could increase
risk of cancer.
Says Dr Graham Giles of The
Cancer Council in Victoria, Australia, who led the research, ‘‘Semen is a very potent and
strong brew of chemicals including potassium, zinc, fructose and
citric acid, which, because of their biological reactivity, could be
carcinogenic if left to lie around. What we found was men who
ejaculated most in their 20s, 30s, and 40s had about a third less
prostate cancer risk than men in the lowest category of
ejaculation.
The research was inspired by
studies linking breast cancer with the frequency of lactation. The
Australian researchers reasoned that just as breastfeeding lowered a
woman’s risk of breast cancer, maybe liberal ejaculation could have
similar benefits for men. Alternately, ejaculation may also induce
prostate cells to mature fully, making them less susceptible to
cancer-causing compounds.
The researchers questioned over
1,000 men who had developed prostate cancer about their sexual
habits, along with 1,250 healthy men. Their results contradicted
those of previous studies, which have suggested that having had many
sexual partners, or a high frequency of sexual activity, increases
the risk of prostate cancer by as much as 40 per cent. The
difference between the two approaches was the definition of sexual
activity. The latest study focused on the number of ejaculations,
whether or not intercourse was involved.
Dr Giles conceded that the men
who completed the questionnaire could have lied about their habits.
But he wasn’t sure whether this skewed the results or not, since
questions about masturbation were unlikely to evoke the same kind of
braggadocio as questions about, say, sexual ‘conquests’, he
said.