|
|
 |
|
August 17,
2002
NASA
plans to read terrorist's minds at airports  By Frank J. Murray
THE
WASHINGTON TIMES
Airport security screeners may soon
try to read the minds of travelers to identify terrorists.
Officials
of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration have told
Northwest Airlines security specialists that the agency is
developing brain-monitoring devices in cooperation with a commercial
firm, which it did not
identify. Space technology would be
adapted to receive and analyze brain-wave and heartbeat patterns,
then feed that data into computerized programs "to detect passengers
who potentially might pose a threat," according to briefing
documents obtained by The Washington
Times. NASA wants to use
"noninvasive neuro-electric sensors," imbedded in gates, to collect
tiny electric signals that all brains and hearts transmit. Computers
would apply statistical algorithms to correlate physiologic patterns
with computerized data on travel routines, criminal background and
credit information from "hundreds to thousands of data sources,"
NASA documents say. The notion has
raised privacy concerns. Mihir Kshirsagar of the Electronic Privacy
Information Center says such technology would only add to
airport-security chaos. "A lot of people's fear of flying would send
those meters off the chart. Are they going to pull all those people
aside?" The organization obtained
documents July 31, the product of a Freedom of Information Act
lawsuit against the Transportation Security Administration, and
offered the documents to this
newspaper. Mr. Kshirsagar's
organization is concerned about enhancements already being added to
the Computer-Aided Passenger Pre-Screening (CAPPS) system. Data from
sensing machines are intended to be added to that
mix. NASA aerospace research
manager Herb Schlickenmaier told The Times the test proposal to
Northwest Airlines is one of four airline-security projects the
agency is developing. It's too soon to know whether any of it is
working, he says. "There are baby
steps for us to walk through before we can make any pronouncements,"
says Mr. Schlickenmaier, the Washington official overseeing
scientists who briefed Northwest Airlines on the plan. He likened
the proposal to a super lie detector that would also measure pulse
rate, body temperature, eye-flicker rate and other biometric aspects
sensed remotely. Though adding mind
reading to screening remains theoretical, Mr. Schlickenmaier says,
he confirms that NASA has a goal of measuring brain waves and
heartbeat rates of airline passengers as they pass screening
machines. This has raised concerns
that using noninvasive procedures is merely a first step. Private
researchers say reliable EEG brain waves are usually measurable only
by machines whose sensors touch the head, sometimes in a "thinking
cap" device. "To say I can take that cap off and put sensors in a
doorjamb, and as the passenger starts walking through [to allow me
to say] that they are a threat or not, is at this point a future
application," Mr. Schlickenmaier said in an
interview. "Can I build a sensor
that can move off of the head and still detect the EEG?" asks Mr.
Schlickenmaier, who led NASA's development of airborne wind-shear
detectors 20 years ago. "If I can do that, and I don't know that
right now, can I package it and [then] say we can do this, or no we
can't? We are going to look at this question. Can this be done? Is
the physics possible?" Two physics
professors familiar with brain-wave research, but not associated
with NASA, questioned how such testing could be feasible or reliable
for mass screening. "What they're saying they would do has not been
done, even wired in," says a national authority on neuro-electric
sensing, who asked not to be identified. He called NASA's goal
"pretty far out." Both professors
also raised privacy
concerns. "Screening systems must
address privacy and 'Big Brother' issues to the extent possible," a
NASA briefing paper, presented at a two-day meeting at Northwest
Airlines headquarters in St. Paul, Minn., acknowledges. Last year,
the Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional police efforts to use
noninvasive "sense-enhancing technology" that is not in general
public use in order to collect data otherwise unobtainable without a
warrant. However, the high court consistently exempts airports and
border posts from most Fourth Amendment restrictions on
searches. "We're getting closer to
reading minds than you might suppose," says Robert Park, a physics
professor at the University of Maryland and spokesman for the
American Physical Society. "It does make me uncomfortable. That's
the limit of privacy invasion. You can't go further than that."
"We're close to the point where
they can tell to an extent what you're thinking about by which part
of the brain is activated, which is close to reading your mind. It
would be terribly complicated to try to build a device that would
read your mind as you walk by." The idea is plausible, he says, but
frightening. At the Northwest
Airlines session conducted Dec. 10-11, nine scientists and managers
from NASA Ames Research Center at Moffett Field, Calif., proposed a
"pilot test" of the Aviation Security Reporting
System. NASA also requested that
the airline turn over all of its computerized passenger data for
July, August and September 2001 to incorporate in NASA's
"passenger-screening testbed" that uses "threat-assessment software"
to analyze such data, biometric facial recognition and
"neuro-electric sensing." Northwest
officials would not
comment. Published scientific
reports show NASA researcher Alan Pope, at NASA Langley Research
Center in Hampton, Va., produced a system to alert pilots or
astronauts who daydream or "zone out" for as few as five
seconds. The September 11 hijackers
helped highlight one weakness of the CAPPS system. They did dry runs
that show whether a specific terrorist is likely to be identified as
a threat. Those pulled out for special checking could be replaced by
others who do not raise suspicions. The September 11 hijackers
cleared security under their own names, even though nine of them
were pulled aside for extra attention.
Back to
Nation/Politics
| |
 |

|