Sealed smoking rooms
would be set up across the city under the VicHealth plan, with
signposts directing office workers in need of a nicotine fix.
Busy shopping strips could also get the designated rooms and
smokers could be made to pay to use them, much like some public
toilets.
Dr Ron Borland, co-director of VicHealth's Centre for Tobacco
Control, said smoking outside city buildings was a problem that
demanded action.
Dr Borland said with growing bans on smoking indoors, "there may
be a need to consider if we should set up safe ingesting rooms".
"Just as we don't want heroin addicts shooting up in back alleys,
so too we don't want to push smokers into those situations," he
said. "I believe there will be moves to ban pavement smoking as a
public annoyance issue.
"It is difficult to justify this ban on public health grounds.
"But in terms of the annoyance factor, people have to walk
through clouds of smoke to get into buildings and stand behind
smokers and this will become an increasing problem."
Dr Borland conceded the smoking rooms idea was controversial, but
outdoor bans had already been introduced in Tasmania and overseas.
Councils and possibly the State Government would be responsible
for the spaces and local government groups have indicated they are
open to the idea.
Dr Borland, who has an international reputation for tobacco
controls, said with about 23 per cent of adults still smoking, those
addicted had to go somewhere.
He said smoking rooms - some of which could be open space and
others fully enclosed with separate ventilation - should not be
serviced as this would encourage people to stay in them, especially
those near office blocks.
"You do not want to allow these rooms to become a smokers' club,"
he said.
The push comes as local councils search for ways to deal with the
massive litter problem from pavement smokers.
The State Government has already asked Parliament's all-party
Family and Community Development Committee to investigate possible
future reforms.
The peak local government body has welcomed Dr Borland's ideas.
"I see some merit in proposing a level of direction to where
people can smoke," said Municipal Association of Victoria president
Brad Matheson. "If we had designated smoking areas, properly signed,
with receptacles for cigarette butts, it would be much more orderly
and there would be less litter."
Victorian Local Gov ernance Association chief executive Mike Hill
said cigarette butts were the single biggest item in the litter
stream.
"Councils have to tackle it now we've pushed smoking out into the
street," Mr Hill said.
He said there could be legal and planning problems with specific
rooms.
Quit executive director Todd Harper said: "I think we are already
seeing moves in that area. If you look at public buildings, there
are regulations banning smoking at entrances and I think this is
more likely to be an area that is not requiring legislation but that
building owners will take on themselves."
Australian Council on Smoking and Health spokesman Ron Edwards
said that in theory smoke rooms were a good idea but he worried it
may cause a backlash among smokers.
The City of Whittlesea has already begun a vigorous litter
enforcement campaign in response to public concern.
It has been so successful that Whittlesea accounts for 50 per
cent of litter fines issued in Victoria. The most common item is
cigarette butts.
A spokesman for Health Minister John Thwaites said any future
statewide reforms would only take place if they had community
support.
Councils and other groups are set to converge on the Melbourne
Town Hall today for a cigarette butt litter prevention summit.