The price of alcohol should be increased, say
researchers |
Alcohol
causes almost as many deaths and disabilities globally as smoking or
high blood pressure, researchers warn.
An international team of scientists, writing in the Lancet, point
out alcohol is a factor in about 60 different diseases.
The researchers found 4% of the global burden of disease is
attributable to alcohol, compared with 4.1% to tobacco and 4.4% to
high blood pressure.
And they said that increasing alcohol prices in the UK could cut
deaths.
The scientists were critical of the UK, saying that it had not
implemented effective alcohol control policies.
The UK is about to introduce legislation allowing 24-hour
drinking from later this year.
Professor Robin Room, of the Centre for Social Research on
Alcohol and Drugs at Stockholm University, is one of the lead
authors of the study.
He told the BBC: "The evidence we have is that if you increase
the drinking hours then you get more trouble with alcohol."
He said the potential effects on health were not taken into
account when changes to licensing laws were considered. "It's a very
short-sighted approach."
'Little effect'
The report looks at diseases including cancers of the mouth,
liver and breast, heart disease and stroke, and cirrhosis in which
alcohol can play a role.
It also highlights the role of alcohol in car accidents,
drownings, falls and poisonings. Alcohol is also linked to a
proportion of self-inflicted injuries and murders.
Using data on alcohol cost and UK alcohol related mortality
information, the researchers estimate that increasing the price of
alcohol by 10% would produce a 7% drop in deaths from cirrhosis of
the liver in men and an 8.3% drop in deaths in women.
Restricting the availability of alcohol by reducing the hours
pubs and shops can sell it would also affect rates of
alcohol-related harm.
Professor Room criticised the emphasis of the UK's alcohol
strategy, published in March last year.
"It emphasises measures that really have very little effect. The
emphasis is on public information and education. There's not much on
taxes."
He added: "A stark discrepancy exists between research findings
about the effectiveness of alcohol control measures and the policy
options considered by most governments.
"In many places, the interests of the alcohol industry have
effectively exercised a veto over policies, making sure that the
main emphasis is on ineffective strategies such as education."
'Sensible drinking'
Professor Ian Gilmore, chairman of the Royal College of
Physicians' alcohol committee, said: "There has been very little
relevant research in this country, so we don't know why we drink the
way we do and how we could change the culture."
He said the health impact of alcohol had to be addressed by the
government.
"It's easier to
demonise the yobs - 'other people'. But 25% of the population are
drinking at a potentially hazardous level. And three million people
are dependent on alcohol."
The British Medical Association said the government was too slow
at tackling public health concerns, such as alcohol abuse.
A Department of Health spokesperson said: "The government is
working with the drinks industry, police and health professionals to
increase awareness of the dangers of excessive drinking and make the
sensible drinking message easier to understand.
"This is a central focus of the Alcohol Harm Reduction Strategy
which clearly sets our plans to tackle issues around the potential
harm of alcohol and anti-social behaviour linked to excessive
drinking."
She added: "We have no evidence to suggest that flexible
licensing hours in the UK will, in fact, lead to increased
consumption of alcohol. Indeed in many countries that have more
liberal licensing hours, binge drinking is far less frequent."
Mark Hastings, of the British Beer and Pub Association, said:
"There are huge flaws in this theory.
"No one is saying let's double the price of food to tackle
obesity."